Daily market analysis
Last updated
Two days ago we flagged $2.33 as the wall to watch and said wave C was targeting $2.27. ICP didn't just tag that target — it blew straight through it. The token dropped roughly 3.5% from $2.28 to $2.20, printed a low near $2.17, bounced, and is now trading around $2.20, down about 2.3–3.2% on the day according to live trackers.
That's the key development. The $2.33 ceiling held perfectly on the bounce back, which means the bearish count isn't just intact — it's confirmed. We're now tracking the next leg down toward the $2.16 and $2.10 zones.
| Metric | Level |
|---|---|
| Current price (approx.) | $2.20 |
| Prior target hit | $2.17 (tagged) |
| Resistance / invalidation | $2.33 |
| Next downside target | $2.16 |
| Extended downside target | $2.10 |
Zoom out to the four-hour chart and the automatic pivot count wants to label the move from $2.25 up to $2.40 as a clean one-through-five impulse. The math disagrees.

What this five-legged shape into $2.40 more likely represents is the final leg of a larger corrective sequence — a double zigzag or WXY pattern completing, not a fresh uptrend starting. From that $2.40 high, price rolled into an A-wave low at $2.13, bounced into a B-wave at $2.33 — and got rejected there hard, for the second time this week. That rejection is the single most important reaction on this chart, and it's also our invalidation line.
On the one-hour, the primary count opens with a five-wave move: wave one to $2.35, wave two down to $2.27, wave three spiking to $2.40, wave four diving to $2.13, and wave five topping at $2.33. But wave three here is actually shorter than wave one — a hard rule break, since wave three can never be the shortest impulse wave. Combined with wave four dragging back into wave one's range, this five-wave shape is again corrective, not a launch pad.

From that $2.33 high, we get an A-wave down to $2.21, a B-wave bounce back up to $2.32 — rejected again at the same shelf — and now a C-wave pressing toward $2.17. That's the primary count: wave C still unfolding, targeting the $2.16 to $2.10 zone below.
If price reclaims and holds above $2.33 — the same level that's rejected price twice now — the entire bearish reading breaks. A reclaim there means we're not in a C-wave down, we're building a fresh impulsive leg, with the next stop being a retest of the $2.40 high and room to extend beyond it.
| Scenario | Trigger | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Primary (bearish) | Rejection continues at $2.33 | $2.16 → $2.10 |
| Alternate (bullish) | Confirmed reclaim/hold above $2.33 | Retest of $2.40, extension beyond |
Drop to the fifteen-minute chart for timing. This is the micro structure inside the bigger C-wave. We see a small one-through-five: wave one basing near $2.21, wave two popping to $2.29, wave three at $2.23, wave four spiking to $2.32, wave five settling at $2.25. Same story as the bigger frames — wave two retraces the full length of wave one, and wave three is the shortest leg. Not a clean impulse, another local exhaustion pattern.

After that five, price rolled over into an A-wave at $2.30, dropped hard into a B-wave low at $2.17 — right on our invalidation shelf — then bounced into a C-wave at $2.23. The flag worth noting: that B-wave is more than double the size of the A-wave, a 2.42 ratio. That's well beyond normal proportion and pushes this into expanded-flat or irregular-correction territory. It tells you the $2.17 low wasn't calm — it was a shakeout, a liquidity grab before the bounce.
Right now price sits around $2.20, having failed to hold above $2.23. As long as that level caps the bounces, sellers stay in control and the path toward $2.17, then the bigger $2.16 target, stays open.
Putting the three timeframes together, here's how the paths stack up in order of probability given current structure and the confirmed rejection at $2.33.
| Rank | Scenario | Key Level | Target |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wave C continues lower | Reject below $2.23 | $2.16 → $2.10 |
| 2 | Local bounce, thesis intact | Hold below $2.33 | Retest $2.17 zone first |
| 3 | Bearish count invalidated | Reclaim + hold above $2.33 | Retest $2.40, extension |
Some independent forecast models are actually leaning toward the $2.25 area holding into the next session, which lines up with the alternate scenario staying on the table rather than being dismissed outright.
Wave counts are only half the picture. It helps to check whether broader price-prediction models and market trackers are leaning the same direction as the Elliott structure right now.
Several trackers show ICP trading in the $2.20–$2.25 band with modest daily declines, which is consistent with a market still digesting the rejection at $2.33 rather than one that's decisively broken out. Longer-range models covering the broader 2026 window put average expected prices in a wider $2.00–$2.86 range, which tells you the market hasn't picked a firm direction over the medium term — it's the shorter-term structure that's giving the cleaner signal right now.
Here's the full level map across all three timeframes, condensed into one reference table.
| Level | Price | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Invalidation (hard) | $2.33 | B-wave rejection zone, flips bearish → bullish if reclaimed |
| Local trigger | $2.235 | 15M close above = local leg may be over |
| Current price | ~$2.20 | Sitting below both trigger levels |
| First downside target | $2.17 | B-wave low / prior shakeout level |
| Primary target | $2.16 | Wave C completion zone |
| Extended target | $2.10 | Fib shelf, deeper C-wave completion |
| Bullish alt target | $2.40 | Prior swing high, retest if $2.33 reclaimed |
This section reflects what the wave count implies structurally — it is analysis, not financial advice, and shouldn't be treated as a trade recommendation.
The setup is straightforward in structure but the timing is the hard part — that's exactly why the 15-minute chart exists as the entry trigger window while the 4H and 1H charts carry the higher-degree thesis.
ICP isn't trading in isolation — it's part of a broader market backdrop where several large-cap alts have been showing similar corrective, capped structures rather than clean fresh impulses. The rejection pattern at a well-defined resistance shelf, followed by a grind lower, is a recurring theme across multiple charts this week, which is part of why the $2.33 rejection on ICP carries extra weight rather than looking like a one-off. Live price data continues to confirm ICP sitting in the $2.20 handle with negative daily momentum, keeping the corrective bias in play.
ICP called the $2.33 wall two days ago, said wave C was targeting $2.27, and price blew straight through both, tagging $2.17 before bouncing back to test that same $2.33 ceiling — and getting rejected again. The invalidation held. The count is alive. Structure across 4H, 1H, and 15M all point to a corrective, capped setup with wave C still eyeing $2.16, and $2.10 beyond that.
The entire bearish thesis hinges on one number: $2.33. Below it, wave C keeps unfolding lower. Above it — reclaimed and held — this flips into a fresh impulsive leg targeting a retest of $2.40. Until that flip happens, the bias stays down, and $2.16 remains the level to watch next.
Yesterday's call on ICP was simple: $2.33 is the line in the sand. If price closes above it and holds, the bearish Elliott Wave case dies. If it fails there, the corrective drop toward $2.16, $2.10 and $2.04 stays alive. Twenty-four hours later, the wall held perfectly — ICP crept up roughly 0.4%, from $2.271 to $2.281, staying entirely inside the same tight range.
As of today, August 17, ICP is changing hands around $2.27, up modestly on the day but still boxed inside the same corrective range that's defined the last week of price action.
Some third-party forecast models are already flagging a similar near-term floor: one widely cited price model puts ICP's August low around $2.16, which lines up almost exactly with our first downside target from the higher-degree count.
Zoom out to the 4-hour chart and the automated wave count wants to label the move off the lows as a clean five-wave impulse: Wave 1 up to $2.31, Wave 2 down to $2.10, Wave 3 up to $2.25, Wave 4 down to $1.99, Wave 5 up to $2.40. It reads well until you check it against Elliott Wave rules — and it fails on two of them at once.
Two structural violations in one count means the impulse label is off the table entirely. What's actually printed here is a larger corrective structure — most likely a flat or a double corrective, not a trending five-wave advance.

Strip away the mislabeled internal waves and look at the skeleton instead: high at $2.31, low at $1.99, high at $2.40. That's the real shape of this move — one broad arc up, now fading. Since the $2.40 top, price has traced Wave A down to $2.13, Wave B up to $2.33 (straight into that resistance wall), and the market is now deciding whether Wave C is ready to run.
The 1-hour chart is where the real decision plays out. The primary count picks up after the five-wave-looking drop to $2.13: Wave A rallies to $2.33, Wave B pulls back to $2.21, and Wave C is now stalling right at $2.32 — just under that same resistance shelf.
| Wave | Price | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Prior low | $2.13 | Start of the A-wave rally |
| Wave A | $2.33 | Rejected at the wall |
| Wave B | $2.21 | Retracement leg |
| Wave C (current) | $2.32 | Fails to clear the A-wave high |
The tell here is in the ratios: Wave C measures 0.60x Wave A, almost identical to Wave B's 0.61x retracement of the prior move. That kind of symmetry, combined with a C-wave that can't clear the A-wave high, is the signature of an exhausted bounce — not the start of a fresh impulse.

Scenario one (primary): confirmation arrives if ICP breaks back below $2.27. That reopens the door to $2.16 and lower, keeping the bearish target ladder alive.
Scenario two (alternate): forget the labels — if ICP closes above $2.33 and holds it on a retest, the bearish read is dead. That flips the structure into an impulsive continuation, with the next magnet being the recent $2.40 high, and room to run further if buyers show up in size.
This is the chart that matters most today. After Wave 5 bottomed near $2.29, ICP traced a textbook corrective sequence: Wave A down to $2.23, then Wave B ripped all the way up to $2.32 — a 1.6x extension of Wave A, well beyond a normal bounce and squarely in expanded-flat territory.
Wave C then came down and almost perfectly mirrored Wave A, landing at $2.27 — 0.95x the length of the A-leg. B overshoots, C matches: that's about as clean an expanded flat as this chart gets, and it prints exactly at today's invalidation line.

| Sub-wave | Price | Ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Wave A | $2.23 | Base leg |
| Wave B | $2.32 | 1.6x Wave A |
| Wave C | $2.27 | 0.95x Wave A |
For an entry, the zone to watch is any bounce back into the $2.29–$2.31 pocket, where the 0.5 and 0.382 Fibonacci retracements stack up — that's the spot to lean short if the higher-degree bearish case is correct. A clean break and close below $2.27, on the other hand, is the green light that Wave C on the bigger chart is finally moving, not stalling.
Structure is only half the picture — positioning tells you whether the crowd agrees or is set up to be squeezed. Recent 24-hour volume on ICP has held steady in the $20–30 million range, with price action compressing tighter as the $2.27–$2.33 range gets tested repeatedly.

The liquidation map shows a meaningful cluster of leveraged long positions sitting just below $2.27. If that level breaks and closes, those longs get forced out, adding fuel to a move toward $2.21 and then the deeper $2.16 target. Above $2.33, the liquidation density thins out noticeably — which is exactly why a genuine breakout there tends to run fast, since there's less resistance from trapped short positions once the wall is cleared.
Right now, yes — mostly. The Elliott Wave structure across all three timeframes points to an exhausted bounce capped at $2.33, and the positioning data backs that up: longs are stacked below current price, meaning any slip under $2.27 has real fuel behind it, not just chart geometry.
| Level | Price | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Key resistance / invalidation | $2.33 | Wave B / A high — bearish case dies above here |
| Entry pocket (short bias) | $2.29 – $2.31 | 0.5 / 0.382 Fib confluence |
| Trigger / current price | $2.27 | 15M expanded-flat completion, today's pivot |
| First downside target | $2.21 | 1H Wave B low |
| Second downside target | $2.16 | Ladder target #1 |
| Third downside target | $2.10 | Ladder target #2 |
| Fourth downside target | $2.04 | Ladder target #3 |
| Bullish invalidation flip target | $2.40 | Prior swing high, next magnet if $2.33 reclaims as support |
Setup per the count (not advice): a short bias only makes sense on a bounce into the $2.29–$2.31 pocket followed by rejection, or on a clean close below $2.27 confirming Wave C has resumed. Either trigger targets the $2.21 → $2.16 → $2.10 → $2.04 ladder. The setup is invalidated the moment $2.33 flips from resistance to support on a retest — at that point the count flips bullish toward $2.40.
The $2.33 wall has now held twice in a row, and the higher-degree structure remains a corrective sequence, not an impulse — the two rule violations on the 4H chart (Wave 2 overshoot, Wave 4 overlap) make that call unambiguous. The 1-hour chart shows a Wave C that can't clear its own A-wave high, and the 15-minute chart just delivered a clean expanded flat that lands exactly on today's key trigger.
Everything now funnels through one number: $2.27. Lose it on a closing basis and the $2.21 → $2.16 → $2.10 → $2.04 ladder is back in play. Hold it, and reclaim $2.33 as support, and the entire bearish read gets scrapped in favor of a run at $2.40 and beyond. ICP is currently pinned right between those two levels, and where it settles by the next 4-hour close will likely decide which count survives the week.
Yesterday we drew a line at $2.33 and said that if ICP couldn't close above it, the bears would keep control. It didn't. Price got rejected right at the wall again and is now sitting near $2.27, with live quotes showing ICP trading around $2.23–$2.30 depending on the venue at the time of writing.
Here's the twist that makes this level worth watching closely: top traders on major derivatives exchanges are reportedly net long roughly five-to-one, while a wall of sell orders sits stacked right at $2.31. Something has to give — and the Elliott Wave structure across three timeframes tells us which side is more likely to win.
Zoom out to the four-hour chart and the story is simple: this is not a clean five-wave impulse. The auto-generated count tags wave 1 at $2.33, wave 2 crashing all the way to $2.10, wave 3 back up to $2.25, wave 4 diving to $1.99, and wave 5 spiking to $2.40. Run the Elliott Wave rules against that sequence and it falls apart immediately.
The far more coherent read is a higher-degree flat or double zigzag: a big A-wave down to $2.13, a B-wave rally that stretched all the way back to $2.40 and even briefly tagged $2.33, and now a C-wave attempting to complete the structure. That B-wave overshoot — rallying above where wave A started — is a textbook expanded flat signature, and it tells you this correction has more room to run before it's actually finished.

The higher-degree skeleton is straightforward: high at $2.33, low at $1.99, high at $2.40. Every swing since has been trying to carve out the final leg down. Price rejected the $2.33 zone again yesterday — exactly the ceiling this flat count needs to hold. As long as that level caps the rallies, the bigger picture stays bearish, and every bounce into resistance is a level to fade, not chase.
On the one-hour chart, the picture sharpens considerably. Here the impulse actually holds up: wave 1 from $2.26, wave 2 down to $2.16 (a 0.38 retrace), wave 3 stretching to $2.35, wave 4 holding at $2.27 without overlapping wave 1, and wave 5 spiking to $2.40. No hard rules broken — this is a valid five-wave skeleton, though wave 3 came in a touch undersized relative to wave 1, a minor flag worth noting.
After the top at $2.40, the correction begins: wave A drops hard to $2.13, wave B rallies aggressively back to $2.33 — a strong, almost-equal-to-the-high B-wave, another classic sign of an expanded flat rather than a simple zigzag. From there, wave C should be unfolding lower right now, first probing $2.21.

| Fib Level | Price Target |
|---|---|
| 0.50 | $2.16 |
| 0.618 | $2.13 |
| 0.786 (extended) | $2.10 – $2.08 |
| Deep extension | $2.04 |
Clear the chart and look at the alternate. If price instead reclaims and holds above $2.33 on a close, the correction is over, wave C doesn't happen, and this becomes a fresh impulsive leg — a wave 3 of a larger degree pushing well beyond the $2.40 high. That's the bullish flip, but it needs a decisive close above $2.33, not just a wick.
A second, lower-probability alternate: price chops sideways between $2.21 and $2.33 for longer, building a triangle before either resolution. That would delay both counts but wouldn't change the ultimate direction once it breaks.
Drop to the fifteen-minute chart and this is purely about timing. The auto count here also breaks the rules — wave 2 retraced more than 13x wave 1, and wave 4 overlaps wave 1 again — so don't treat this as a real impulse either.
What we're actually watching is a small ABC: wave A dropped to $2.21, and price is now inside a wave B bounce that's climbed back to $2.28, sitting right on the invalidation line for this local structure.

| Fib Level | Price |
|---|---|
| 0.236 | $2.27 |
| 0.382 | $2.26 |
| 0.786 | $2.24 |
That's the shallow retracement zone you'd expect from a B-wave inside a bigger downtrend — not a full reversal. This is the exact spot the entry needs to prove itself. If price stalls and rolls over anywhere between $2.27 and $2.28, that's the local C-wave beginning, and it lines up perfectly with the 1H wave-C-down thesis and the 4H flat-completion thesis. All three timeframes agree on the same ceiling.
| Scenario | Trigger | Target | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary: C-wave down | Rejection at $2.27–$2.28 | $2.16 → $2.13 → $2.04 | Highest probability — all 3 timeframes align |
| Triangle chop | Range $2.21–$2.33 persists | Delays resolution | Possible if neither side commits |
| Bullish reclaim | Confirmed close above $2.33 | New leg beyond $2.40 | Invalidates the C-wave-down thesis |
Live pricing near $2.23–$2.30 shows ICP still trapped in exactly the zone this framework predicted, with broader forecast models also pegging near-term ranges in the $2.00–$2.86 band for the coming weeks.
This is where it gets interesting. Structure says one thing; positioning is telling a slightly different story. Top traders on major derivatives platforms are reportedly net long roughly 5-to-1 at current levels — a crowded long positioning that often precedes exactly the kind of shakeout the C-wave count is calling for. Crowded longs into resistance are classic fuel for a liquidation-driven leg lower.
Liquidation heatmaps show dense clusters of leveraged long positions stacked just below current price, with a mirrored wall of sell orders parked at $2.31. If price can't clear that wall and instead rolls over, a cascade through those long liquidation clusters would accelerate any move toward the $2.16–$2.13 zone — adding fuel exactly where the wave count expects the C-wave to accelerate.

In other words: the positioning data doesn't contradict the wave count — it amplifies it. A break below $2.27–$2.28 with the sell wall at $2.31 already rejecting rallies gives dip-driven liquidations a clean runway lower.
Yes, largely. The 4H flat count, the 1H wave-C-down primary, the 15M timing setup, and the order-flow picture (crowded longs + a stacked sell wall at $2.31) all point the same direction: fade the bounce, don't chase it, unless $2.33 gets reclaimed on a confirmed close.
| Level Type | Price | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Hard invalidation | $2.33 | Bull flip if closed above — kills the C-wave thesis |
| Trigger / sell wall | $2.31 | Order-flow resistance matching wave count |
| Local B-wave ceiling | $2.27 – $2.28 | Where the 15M setup needs to roll over |
| First downside target | $2.24 | 0.786 on the 15M fib |
| Primary target 1 | $2.16 | 0.50 retrace on the A-B swing |
| Primary target 2 | $2.13 | 0.618 retrace + prior A-wave low |
| Extended target | $2.09 – $2.04 | 0.786+ extension zone |
Per the count — and this is analysis, not financial advice — the cleanest setup is a short bias triggered on a rejection between $2.27 and $2.28, invalidated only by a confirmed close above $2.33. Anyone leaning bullish should wait for that close, not a wick, before treating the correction as over.
| Timeframe | Count Status | Current Phase | Bias |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4H | Corrective flat (not impulsive) | Awaiting final C-wave leg | Bearish under $2.33 |
| 1H | Valid 5-wave impulse, now correcting | Wave C unfolding, testing $2.21 | Bearish primary / bullish alternate above $2.33 |
| 15M | Invalid impulse, treated as ABC | Wave B bounce near invalidation | Watching $2.27–$2.28 for rollover |
Current spot pricing keeps ICP oscillating in this exact decision zone, roughly between $2.23 and $2.30 across major venues, which is precisely why $2.33 above and $2.21–$2.24 below remain the levels that matter most this week.
ICP defended its rejection at $2.33 for a second consecutive session, keeping the bearish C-wave-down primary count fully intact across the 4H, 1H and 15M timeframes. The bigger-picture structure is corrective, not impulsive — a flat or expanded flat that still needs one more leg lower to complete. Order flow adds weight to that read: traders are crowded net-long 5-to-1 into a stacked $2.31 sell wall, a combination that often resolves with a liquidation-driven flush rather than a clean breakout.
The trigger to watch is simple — a rollover between $2.27 and $2.28 opens the door toward $2.16, $2.13 and eventually $2.04. A confirmed close above $2.33 is the only thing that flips this bearish, turning the correction into a fresh impulsive leg beyond $2.40. Until then, every bounce into resistance remains a level to fade, not chase.
More on Internetcomputer: elliott wave · technical analysis
Analysis and education, not investment advice. See our editorial policy.